Trakium AI
Request a demo
For client-delivery teams

Explain the workday behind client delivery.

Employee monitoring for software houses and agencies in Pakistan. Connect reporting-device status, workday evidence, alerts and reports, then reconcile the record with your project work before preparing a client update.

Request a demo See the review workflow
Trakium overview showing team presence, recorded activity and reporting status in Demo Corp
Real product screen with synthetic demonstration data, not customer results.Open full-size screenshot
A software-house review workflow

Answer a client’s question without reconstructing the whole week.

For Pakistani software houses and agencies working with local or overseas clients, a useful review connects the workday record to the delivery commitments already in your project system.

  1. Check coverage

    Confirm the right person, date and reporting device. An empty record needs a coverage check, not a performance accusation.

  2. Inspect the workday

    Open the person’s timeline and periodic screenshots. Review measured duration and application context around the relevant time.

  3. Resolve the exception

    Read an alert’s rule and context, ask about the work, and record the reviewer’s decision.

  4. Prepare the update

    Reconcile the record with tickets, commits and approved time. Share relevant delivery facts, not an unfiltered screenshot folder.

See the product evidence Use the pilot scorecard
Real product screens

Know what to inspect at each step.

These screens use synthetic demonstration data. Their example counts and scores are not customer results or performance benchmarks.

People → person → date

Check who and what is reporting.

The People view lists the workforce and reporting devices. From a person’s record, select the relevant day and inspect the timeline or screenshots before explaining a gap.

  • Confirm that the employee and Windows device are linked.
  • Distinguish a device that is not reporting from a recorded idle interval.
  • Review application or website context with measured duration; then check the related project records.

Ask in your demo: show a reporting device and a missing-data case, then open a recorded workday. The roster alone cannot explain delivered work.

Trakium People view with Windows agent setup, workforce roster and reporting-device count in Demo Corp
People identifies the roster and reporting coverage. It is not a project timesheet.Open full-size screenshot
Alerts → evidence → review

Investigate a signal, not a verdict.

The alert queue identifies a person, timestamp and rule. Inspect the available context and discuss the work before marking an exception reviewed. A rule match is not proof of misconduct.

  • Check the rule and time window rather than relying on its priority colour.
  • Use the employee’s activity record to investigate the surrounding work.
  • Allow for documentation, calls, planning and approved tools in a developer’s day.

Ask in your demo: open an alert and trace its available evidence. Confirm any evidence limitations; not every alert includes an image preview.

Trakium Alerts queue in Demo Corp showing people, timestamps and example rule matches
Example rules and synthetic alerts illustrate the queue; they are not recommended default policies.Open full-size screenshot
Reports → source record → client update

Explain the pattern and its limits.

Executive reporting summarises recorded activity for an authorised reviewer. Confirm the report’s dates and coverage, then reconcile it with deliverables and accepted time before using it in a client update.

  • Check the period and amount of recorded activity before generalising.
  • Inspect the source record when a summary raises a question.
  • Prepare a separate, reviewed client update without unrelated employee or client information.

Ask in your demo: compare a report total with the underlying record. The example screen itself notes that application time does not identify the specific task performed.

Trakium executive report in Demo Corp with report parameters, summary and explicit limits on a small activity sample
A real demonstration report. Its sample is too small to establish delivery quality or a productivity improvement.Open full-size screenshot
Keep the scope clear

Activity evidence is one part of proof of work.

Trakium records

Device reporting, desktop activity, measured duration, periodic screenshots, reviewable alerts and workforce reports.

Your project records explain

Ticket ownership, code changes, accepted deliverables, client approvals and the reason a task took longer than expected.

Your billing process approves

Contract terms, project allocation, accepted billable time and invoices. This walkthrough does not automate those decisions.

Plan a client evidence pack Review responsible monitoring
Test before expanding

Run a pilot you can evaluate.

Agree the monitoring policy with the team, select comparable workdays and define success before collecting results. Record demonstrated requirements and compare review effort, reporting coverage and employee corrections.

Software-house pilot scorecard

Use this worksheet during a vendor demo and a small, agreed pilot. Record what was actually demonstrated, then compare a baseline with a comparable pilot period. These are your evaluation notes, not Trakium-generated results.

No account or submission is needed. Entries stay in this page’s memory; this tool does not submit or save them. Reload to clear the worksheet. Do not enter employee names or confidential client details. Print your entries using your browser, or download the blank worksheet to complete separately.

Download blank PDF (3 pages)

8 not checked · 0 demonstrated · 0 needs follow-up · 0 not met

The download is a blank, print-ready worksheet, not a copy of your entries or a fillable PDF form. It requires no account.

1. Record the demo evidence

Not checked

Not checked

Not checked

Not checked

Not checked

Not checked

Not checked

Not checked

2. Compare the operating results
Manager review time

Minutes per reviewed employee-day. Compare the same review scope and similar roles.

Days with incomplete reporting

Affected employee-days / expected employee-days. Include the denominator; keep outage days identifiable.

Records corrected after employee review

Corrected records / records reviewed. A correction is feedback, not proof of poor performance.

Client-update preparation time

Minutes per update. Use the same client-update format in both periods.

3. Agree the criteria and record the decision

Define the required evidence, acceptable reporting gaps and review effort before testing.

Not recorded

Record the evidence, remaining gaps, responsible role and next review date. Leave undecided until reviewed.

Not recorded

Agree the acceptance criteria before the pilot. Review reporting gaps and employee corrections alongside review time. Do not turn an activity score, one screenshot or an empty record into a performance verdict.

Read the Pakistan buyer’s guide Compare software categories Request a workflow demo
Questions for this workflow

Evaluating Trakium for software houses and agencies.

What does proof of work mean for a software house?

It means a reviewable record of computer-based activity: reporting-device status, measured duration, applications, websites and periodic screenshots. Reconcile that record with tickets, commits, meetings and accepted deliverables. Activity evidence supports a client conversation; it does not prove code quality or automatically make time billable.

Does Trakium automatically assign time to client projects or generate invoices?

No. Do not treat this workflow as automatic project or task attribution, client billing or invoicing. A project lead checks the activity record against the team’s existing project records and approved timesheet before preparing a client update.

Does idle time mean a developer was not working?

Not necessarily. Reading, planning, meetings and work away from the keyboard can produce little input. Check the surrounding record, device reporting, work expectations and the employee’s explanation before reaching a conclusion.

Should clients receive employee screenshots or access to the app?

Not by default. Prepare a reviewed update containing the relevant delivery facts and approved time. Keep unrelated activity, personal information and confidential material out of it. Sharing raw evidence requires an agreed purpose and access policy; this workflow does not offer a client portal.

What should we test before rolling Trakium out?

Test a representative Windows workday, missing-device data, a contextual screenshot review, an alert review, report totals and employee self-service. Agree access and retention rules, record a baseline, and compare review effort and reporting gaps during a small pilot before expanding.

A clearer workday

See Trakium for software houses and agencies.

We’ll map the product to your team structure, review policy, and success measures before suggesting a pilot.

Request a demo Explore the product